Two out of Three Ain't Bad?

"And all I can do is keep on telling you, I want you, I need you; But there ain't no way I'm ever going to love you; Now don't be sad, 'cause two out of three ain't bad" - Lyrics to the song Two Out of Three Ain't Bad by Meatloaf

If there is one metric that tells the true story of the state of the economy it is the labor statistics.  Or does it?  As I have repeated in previous blogs, pretty much every statistic from inflation to the labor market numbers are fudges, guesses, estimates stabs in the dark; call them what you will but they are manipulated and the labor statistics are no different.

As an example take the monthly labor reports.  Each month the Bureau of Labor Statistics adds a fake 75,000 jobs to the labor force from their Birth/Death computer model to account for new company births.  This is based on the range of new company start ups from the previous 20 years prior to the financial crisis.  During this period on average the net number of new firms (that means more firms opening than closing per year) ranged between 75,000 and 200,000 a year.  To account for this the BLS blindly adds 75,000 new jobs per month to their reported numbers.  Well according to the US Census Bureau the number of net new company openings since the financial crisis is just 33,000 a year, less than half of the prior period so this fake number of new jobs is vastly overstated.

Even though we know the numbers are wrong they do tell a story.  If they are consistently wrong each month then at least we have a benchmark to work with.  Taking this benchmark as being overly optimistic (based on the above analysis) means that the printed numbers are far worse than what is published.  To offset some of the errors adjustments are made to reflect miscalculations and these result in revised numbers that are possibly closer to the true number however most people ignore the revisions but their story tells a clearer tale.

Therefore taking today's published May job figures (prior to revisions) of non farm payroll increasing by 38,000 and private sector payroll increasing by 25,000 regardless of the how wrong they are they are still anemic.  Consensus was for them each to increase by 160,000 so these are truly disastrous figures.  On top of this April and March's numbers were revised downwards even further to fall well below the 160,000.  This 160,000 number is Wall Street's current "required" number to show economic health.  This number has also been revised lower as the economy was sputtering so badly that they had to reduce the number in order to print bullish headlines.  Were the economy truly healthy this "required" number would be in the range of 250,000 a month but as that is not even remotely possible, Wall Street analysts have quickly reduced their number of economic stability.

The next interesting statistic comes from the unemployment rate which fell to 4.7% versus 5.0% in April.  Wow, so magically the unemployment rate is falling even as less firms are added to the pool of companies AND as hiring falters.  In an economy the size of the United States you need to increase the number of jobs by roughly 150,000 a month just to remain at status quo in terms of the unemployment rate.  The reason for this is that the population is growing so the economy needs to suck up the additions to the work force to maintain equilibrium but magically the unemployment rate is falling.  How is this even possible?

Well when a person goes on unemployment benefits they are logged as unemployed.  As long as they remain on benefits they are counted.  If their benefits run out before they can find a job then they are magically "employed" according to the count!  This is how the number is improving.  Taking a look at the U6 number which includes people working part time but want full time work the number quickly balloons to 9.7%.  This number is stuck at roughly the same level as where it ballooned to during the 2002 and 2003 recession; hardly something to sing about.

The most telling number of all to me is the participation rate.  This number basically takes the total number of people working divided by the number of people in the population (not quite as simple as that but you get the idea) and this results in another metric.  This number FELL to 62.6% from 62.8% and is well BELOW where it was at the height of the recession!  Yes back in 2009 this number was around 65% so 5 trillion dollars of money has managed to make this number worse by almost 4%!  And to think that they are actually considering an interest rate hike because the economy is "strengthening"; what a joke.  I guess the rate hike is based on the lyrics of the song that, "two out of three (employed) ain't bad'!