The Good Old Days

"Wish we could turn back time to the good old days;
When our momma sang us to sleep but now we're stressed out." - lyrics to the song Stressed Out by Twenty One Pilots

I know I have been off the air for a month but it is summer and time for a break right?  In all honesty while it was partially a break, the lack of correspondence was more a factor of too much work on my plate so something had to give and I chose to let the blog go for a month.  That said not a lot has changed in the last month; more hot air from the central bankers of the world, more stimulus and a couple of very poor candidates to chose from to run the country.

I was reminiscing over the last few weeks about what life used to be like in the "good old days".  It is hard to even remember a time before 1995 in the investment world but it seems that with the advent of the Internet everything changed.  To me those were the good old days when central bankers of the world operated in a relatively insulated bubble, focusing on their local economies.  Stimulus was left to tinkering with interest rates and bank reserves with limited open market manipulation.  Recessions came and went as a normal course of business.  Companies were valued on their balance sheet strength, growth opportunities and profitability.  Global debt (businesses, consumers and government) according to The McKinsey Global Institute stood at around $30 Trillion.

Fast forward to today and global debt is north of $200 Trillion or roughly $27,000 per person!  Furthermore the central bankers of the world have decided that $130 Trillion in 20 years is not even close to enough so they are pushing even more debt out into the market.  Just this month the BOE, Bank of Japan and the ECB have announced additional stimulus amounting to more than $50 billion a month!  What are we supposed to do with all this additional debt?

The idea is that we spend it on useless things like another iPhone or a new car (both of which are direct direct beneficiaries) however all that this stimulus does is bring future sales forward stealing economic growth from the future.  An example is China who reduced the tax on automobile purchases to 5% from 10%.  This stimulus increased automobile sales in China to north of 26 million units in the quarter but this incredible run will surely end when the stimulus ends at the end of the year.  People do not need new cars every year and looking forward the result of the stimulus will be to destroy automobile sales in China next year.

The issue is that adding more debt is not helping but is crowing out the normal private market and economic growth.  This crowding out is cutting heavily into GDP growth rates but is shown in its stark reality when you look at Wall Street.  In 1998 when "stimulus" had just begun under Greenspan, the number of companies publicly traded peaked at just over 8,000.  Since then the effect of all of this debt has been to crowd out the public markets and the number of listed companies is now half of what it was.  Some of this has to do with poor management however the bulk of the change has been from companies using debt to acquire other listed companies or management teams taking companies private using debt as the lever.

Not only have companies been using debt to acquire each other, they have also been turning to debt to juice their poor results.  Issue debt, buy back shares and hey presto you have better than expected earnings per share!  In fact companies are so awash with debt that some of them have massive negative tangible book values.  Remember that tangible is something that is real like a desk or a car whereas intangible is imaginary like Goodwill.  In the case of IBM as an example removing $42 billion of goodwill and intangible assets results in a negative book value of $25 billion!  Broadcom is not much better with a negative tangible book value of $22 billion.  Who would ever buy these shares and why are they even listed?

Looking at the balance sheets of some big names it just amazes me that more attention is not given to the balance sheets of businesses.  Microsoft now has $55 billion where not too long ago it had zero, Oracle has $43 billion, Apple has $85 billion, Intel $24 billion, IBM $44 billion and Cisco is at $29 billion.  Now while these companies are large this debt burden is enormous.  Heaven help them if at some point int he future interest rates rise and they cannot repay the debt!

But while interest rates are low the party continues and my analysis points to low interest rates for a while to come.  Not that I think that interest rates should be low, they should not, but because the central bankers of the world are going to continue to manipulate them for as long as possible.  They will also continue to print money in a vein hope that one of these dollars will eventually stimulate the global economy.  How ignorant and blind are they?  This is the biggest experiment known to man and one that has no chance of working out well.  The problem is that while ALL of the central bankers of the world continue to push money into the pot together there are no real repercussions.  Everyone's interest rates remain low or continue lower and everyone's currency weakens at the same rate.  No-one gains the upper hand so they try even more "stimulus".  Bond yields continue to wilt and it is just a matter of time before helicopter money policies are used (by passing the banking system and sending money directly to people).  Already there is talk of a perpetual bond (one with no end) and other crazy schemes but the results are all the same - nothing but a large pool of debt!

In this world of unbelievable craziness comes the demand for social policies and walls from the electorate.  Voters are turning to politicians who are promising things that are not only detrimental to long term growth but to the viability of capitalism.  It will not be long before capitalism is pointed to as the root of the problem.  However, it is not capitalism that is creating the problem it is the manipulation of the very fabric of free markets, the heart of capitalism, by the central bankers of the world, the supposed protectors of capitalism, that is at fault.

So while it is impossible to bring back the good old days it is possible to protect yourself and your portfolio by extracting yourself from debt and moving into gold or other assets that are antifragile.